Agreement Passe Compose French

Agreement Passe Compose French

Did you see Romain`s new bike? This is it. [„Roman`s new motorcycle“ is the direct object; in the first sentence, it does not conform to the verb; in the second sentence, the personal pronoun „the“ is the direct object that replaces „Roman`s new motorcycle“; the old „bought“ stake therefore agrees with it.] Of course, if the noun is replaced by an object pronoun, this pronoun is always direct and the reflexive pronoun is always indirect, so there is no agreement with it. However, as the direct object precedes the verb, past participation is subject to a direct object agreement. 5) For semi-auxiliary verbs, there is no correspondence with the direct object, because the object always belongs to the infinitive, not the semi-auxiliary object. A lot of people want to avoid the direct object agreement – what do you think? Read the article and chat on Facebook: [Who/what is washed?-> „They.“ The subject is therefore the recipient of the appeal, there is consensus.] If there is a direct object that is the recipient of the action, then the rules of the agreement are the same as to have: the past participant agrees with the direct object when placed in front of the verb and does not accept if placed after. But the verbs have to be approved in a very specific construction: the participatory past must agree with the direct object if the verb moves forward. The rules of agreement of past participants are different. The basics are: [Who/what is washed?-> „hands.“ „Hands“ is the direct object and is placed according to the verb, disagree.] For some verbs, the Past Participant must agree on sex and number, either with the subject or with the subject of the sentence. This agreement is necessary in the following situations: the pronoun verbs have a reflexive pronoun that refers to the subject, and this reflexive pronoun represents either the direct object or the indirect object of the verb.

Here is the tricky part: the agreement is only necessary if the reflexive pronoun is a direct object; if it is indirect, there is no agreement. So to know if current participants need to agree, you need to determine the function of the reflexive prognosis. That`s how it works. As you know, The French you can be used to refer to either more than one person (you plural) or politely to a single person (formal). In the Compound Past of (Summer) Words, the agreement depends on the use of You: The possibility of a direct object agreement is maintained in accordance with point 31.2 above. However, for irregular verbs, we need to look for the past part of the list of irregular verbs, or check the conjugator verb — or simply memorize the forms. For reflexive verbs, the reflexive pronoun comes after the first part of the negation and before the auxiliary verb (having/being). It is a form of composite verb that consists of a conjugated tool (Stretch or have) and the old participatory verb. We use having when descent, (r)enter, (re)climb, return, return and exit are followed by a direct object. In this case, the meaning of the verb often changes. The bad news is that the French are using several times gone by.

1) Pronoun verb with no name after it – > chord is less widespread „atre“ than „have“ as a useful verb, but some common French verbs use it when conjugated in the compound past. . Once you know what helps to use the verb, all you need to do is add the past part of the verb you want to conjugate. While it takes time to get used to all these new conjugations, mistakes will rarely prevent you from being understood. In fact, the French regularly make mistakes using the compound past.


This is a unique website which will require a more modern browser to work!

Please upgrade today!